Skip to content
MWITA& Company Advocates
Litigation

Commercial Litigation Timelines in the High Court, What the 2025 Reforms Mean for Strategy

or most of the last decade, the strategic question in commercial litigation in Kenya was how to manage time, both the time the court would take, and the time the other side would take to use it against you. The 2025 procedural reforms have begun, quietly, to invert that question.

The Commercial and Tax Division is moving cases through their first three milestones faster than at any point we have tracked. The reforms themselves are familiar, front-loaded evidence, narrower pleading, active case management, but the effect on strategy is the part worth thinking about.

Front-loaded evidence changes the brief

Where pleadings used to be the place a case was framed and disclosure was the place it was won, witness statements and document bundles are now the locus of both. A weak first statement is the most expensive document a commercial client can file: it sets the frame the court reads for the rest of the matter.

  • The witness statement is now the pleading. Treat it as one.
  • Documentary annexures filed with the statement are part of the record; documents introduced later face friction.
  • The narrative the client wants the court to hold is in front of the judge by the case-management conference, or it is not in front of the judge at all.

Case-management is now an event, not a formality

Judges are using the case-management conference to set hard deadlines and to indicate, with increasing candour, the parts of a case they do not find persuasive. This is helpful, provided you have prepared for the indication. We are seeing matters settle in the weeks immediately after a CMC at a rate we did not see in 2023.

Interim relief is moving in days, not months

Applications for injunctions and freezing orders are being heard substantively within ten to fourteen days. The strategic effect is that the urgent application has become a usable tool again, rather than a placeholder until the case can be heard on its merits in a year. Whether to apply, and what to apply for, is now a question that can be answered on a commercial timeline.

What we are telling clients

Three changes follow from the new tempo. First, invest more in the first witness statement than felt necessary three years ago. Second, prepare the settlement position before the case-management conference, not after. Third, treat interim relief as a live option, not a last resort. The cost of doing each of these well is paid back many times over by the matters that now close in months rather than years.

Filed underHigh CourtCommercial DisputesProcedure
← Back to all insightsShare with a colleague
Need counsel on this?

Speak to a partner about how this applies to your matter.

Request a consultation